Public Release Screening Checklist
Use before publishing process evidence, worked cases, slides or archival material.
Evidence status
- Every direct quotation has been checked against an authoritative source.
- Reconstructed conversation wording is paraphrased, not quoted.
- Current interpretation is distinguishable from contemporaneous evidence.
- Empirical claims refer to frozen/verified project evidence.
Confidentiality and permissions
- No confidential peer-review material is included.
- No private collaborator material is included without permission.
- No personal identifiers are exposed unintentionally.
- Third-party images and screenshots have appropriate rights or have been removed.
- Publisher or journal confidentiality requirements have been checked.
Research claims
- The worked application is presented as a developmental illustration, not validation of the reason-provenance framework.
- Generated code/text is not described as verified evidence merely because it was generated.
- Methodological claims do not exceed the comparator and robustness evidence.
- Attribution claims are bounded to what the record can establish.
- Attribution is kept separate from normative endorsement of the division of labour.
- Academic Writing Filter material is not described as evidence of improved writing, publication probability, reviewer agreement or speed.
- Retrospective claim-preservation examples are not described as proof that a formal claim contract existed during the original empirical episode.
Academic Writing Filter rights and provenance
- The canonical filter has not been silently relicensed by inclusion in this repository.
- Cochrane is not described as author, approver or endorser of the Academic Writing Filter.
- Any direct reproduction of the canonical filter complies with the source project’s final provenance/copyright decision.
- Public citation metadata for the filter and working paper are current.
Metadata
- Author name is correct.
- Affiliation is Department of Social Statistics, University of Manchester.
- Repository version is correct.
- Citation metadata is correct.
- Licence and third-party rights statements are correct.
- DOI has been added after archival deposit, if applicable.